Dushyant Chautala condemns Pipli lathicharge, farmers plan 3-hr highway blockade on Sept 20

Written by Sukhbir Siwach
| Chandigarh |

Updated: September 13, 2020 10:06:30 pm

farmers protest, Haryana farmers protest, farmers protest Haryana, Dushyant Chautala on farmers protest, India news, Indian ExpressThe agitating farmers additionally blocked site visitors on the nationwide freeway for over 4 hours, inflicting hardship to hundreds of commuters who used village hyperlink roads to bypass Pipli.

Three day after lathicharge on Haryana farmers at Pipli in Kurukshetra, Haryana Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala Sunday broke his silence and condemned the “Pipli incident” whereas elevating questions within the method the September 10 farmers’ stir was dealt with.

For the previous three days, the opposition has been taking up CM Manohar Lal Khattar and Dushyant, who’s a senior chief of Jannayak Janata Party (JJP), blaming each of them for the police motion in opposition to farmers’ protesting in opposition to Center’s agri ordinances. A day after the lathicharge (September 11), Farmers had even staged a protest in entrance of Dushyant’s non-public residence at Sirsa.

The JJP, which tasks itself as a political outfit devoted to “defending pursuits of farmers”, has been on the receiving finish “for not siding with farmers” on the lathicharge situation regardless of Dushyant’s youthful brother, Digvijay Chautala, condemning the incident on September 10 itself.

Read | In Punjab, private buyers of cotton come out in favour of Centre’s ordinance

On the day of the lathicharge, Digvijay had said: “Resorting to lathicharge is brutal particularly on a senior citizen because the pictures being performed on media present. We don’t anticipate such issues to happen. It has damage the feelings of farmers basically and we perceive their ache.” In truth, after Digvijay’s remarks, two BJP MPs – Dharambir Singh and Brijendra Singh – too had brazenly spoken in opposition to the lathicharge episode.

On Sunday, Dushyant Chautala spoke out brazenly in opposition to the incident. He stated, “Certainly, I want to say one factor that the incident which passed off at Pipli is condemnable. There ought to be a probe in opposition to these individuals who first stopped, however later gave permission (for the rally).”

Defending Dushyant’s earlier silence on the matter, JJP’s state workplace secretary, Randhir Singh, informed The Indian Express that the Deputy CM was not nicely for the previous three days due to an infection in his throat.

Farmer protests to proceed

Meanwhile, the agitating farmers have introduced that they may block roads throughout Haryana on September 20 for 3 hours – from 12 midday to three pm – to oppose three central ordinances and to hunt a legislation, which ensures minimal help worth (MSP) for his or her crops. The leaders of farm our bodies held a gathering at Jind Sunday the place they introduced dharnas in any respect district headquarters from September 15. Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU) president Gurnam Singh Chaduni, who’s main the stir in Haryana, was additionally current within the assembly. “No political social gathering can be allowed to enter within the stir,” they resolved.

Farmer leaders clarified that they haven’t met the three-member committee of the BJP MPs – Dharambir Singh, Brijendra Singh and Nayab Singh Saini — which has been shaped by the state unit of the social gathering to carry talks with the farmers. “If any talks are held, then the identical can be held within the presence of all taking part farm organisations,” says Rakesh Bains, a pacesetter of the BKU.

Meanwhile, the three-member committee of BJP MPs continued to fulfill farmers and different stakeholders conjunctively on the second day on Sunday.

Read | No ordinance can be in interest of farmers unless it guarantees MSP of crops: Hooda

Speaking to The Indian Express, BJP MP Dharambir Singh stated that they, together with representatives of farmers, will meet the Union Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Minister Narendra Singh Tomar earlier than introduction of the payments associated to a few central ordinances in Parliament.

“We will attempt to meet Tomar by September 16 in order that the farmers’ representatives might give their recommendations to him earlier than the payments are mentioned in Parliament,” stated Dharambir Singh indicating that the farmers might meet the Union Minister within the presence of state Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar and state BJP president Om Prakash Dhankar. When requested concerning the recommendations given by farmers, Dharambir Singh stated they need MSP for crops and the present mandi system to proceed.

Dushyant additionally insisted that “there will likely be no ban on the procurement of wheat and paddy on the price of MSP even after the introduction of the three central ordinances”.

“The MSP system will proceed. The system of mandis received’t collapse. Savings of the farmers can be extra after the introduction of the three ordinances,” he added, whereas blaming the opposition for propaganda on three central ordinances.

BJP panel shaped to mislead farmers: Hooda

Meanwhile, former CM Bhupinder Singh Hooda has questioned the committee of three MPs shaped by the BJP to speak to the agitating farmers. Hooda alleged “the goal of the committee is to mislead the farmers”.

“If the committee has any energy, then it ought to first take motion in opposition to those that hit farmers with sticks. The committee ought to instantly withdraw the circumstances lodged in opposition to the farmers. On one hand, the federal government is suppressing the farmers’ stir by exhibiting concern of authorized circumstances, whereas however they’re providing a dialogue,” Hooda stated.

Hooda requested that if the state Chief Minister and the Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Minister have already described the ordinances as a “pro-farmer reform”, then who will even think about the suggestions of the committee shaped by the state BJP president?

From Explained | Three ordinances and a protest: Why Haryana and Punjab farmers are angry

“Will the central authorities change its determination on the premise of advice of this committee shaped solely to mislead the farmers of the state? Why did the federal government run away from discussing the invoice within the Assembly underneath the guise of corona? The authorities wants to inform the farmers why it introduced the ordinances in the course of the corona period? Were the provisions of the ordinances mentioned with farm organisations and farmer leaders earlier than they had been launched in June? Why had been they not introduced earlier than Parliament first?” Hooda requested.

The Leader of Opposition additional questioned, “Will the BJP help us if the Congress brings a non-public member invoice within the session of the Assembly in future to ensure MSP to farmers? If the BJP doesn’t do that, will these three ordinances be rejected on the strains of Punjab?”

Hooda stated that if the BJP was critical about defending the pursuits of the farmers, it could have consulted them earlier than bringing these three ordinances. “If the federal government had been critical about accepting the demand of the farmers, as an alternative of imposing the ordinances on the farmers, they’d have added the availability of assure of MSP to it,” Hooda remarked. He added {that a} separate Ordinance ought to be introduced for this (MSP), if wanted.

The Leader of Opposition said that the committee floated by the BJP “is an try to interrupt the unity of the farmers by diverting consideration from the actual points”.

“Rather than speaking to farmer organisations which are combating the battle in opposition to the ordinances, they’re speaking to their very own organisations,” stated Hooda.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the most recent headlines

For all the most recent India News, obtain Indian Express App.

© The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here