Hathras sufferer gave 2 statements, alleged molestation, rape: UP govt to SC

Written by Mallica Joshi
, Rahul Sabharwal
| New Delhi |

October 7, 2020 12:37:00 am

supreme court hathras case, supreme court hathras rape case, hathras case, hathras news, hathras case news, hathras rape case news, hathras rape case today news, hathras case news, hathras gangrape case, hathras gangrape case latest newsPolice deployed within the village of the Dalit lady in Hathras

TWO STATEMENTS of the 19-year-old Dalit lady had been recorded and videotaped after she was admitted to Jawaharlal Medical College in Aligarh on September 14, in line with an affidavit filed by the Uttar Pradesh authorities within the Supreme Court.

The lady died on September 29, two weeks after she was assaulted and allegedly gangraped in Hathras.

According to the UP authorities’s affidavit, filed by standing counsel Garima Prashad, the lady’s first assertion was recorded by a girl constable within the hospital on September 19, through which she stated that Sandeep, one of many 4 accused who was arrested the subsequent day, had “additionally molested her and tried to kill her by strangulating her with a material (dupatta)”.

“That on 19.09.2020, the assertion of the sufferer beneath Section 161 CrPC was recorded by a girl constable, Ms Rashmi, whereas the sufferer was nonetheless admitted within the ICU of the neuro ward at mattress no. 09, within the presence of the sufferer’s father… and the mom… which was additionally videotaped. The sufferer acknowledged that the accused, Sandeep alias Chandu, had additionally molested her and tried to kill her by strangulating her with a material (dupatta). On the idea of the stated assertion, the police instantly added Section 354 of the IPC to the FIR,” the affidavit states.

A replica of this assertion has not been annexed with the affidavit.

The affidavit states that two days later, on September 21, the lady’s dad and mom stated they needed her assertion to be taken once more. “On 21.09.020, the investigating officer was knowledgeable by the sufferer’s dad and mom that they needed the police to take the sufferer’s assertion once more on 22.09.2020. In view of such request, the I.O. reached the Aligarh hospital with a girl head constable, Ms Sarla… and once more recorded the sufferer’s assertion in Ward no. four of the ICU which was additionally videotaped. The sufferer, for the primary time acknowledged that ‘…when my mom and I had gone to fetch fodder, then Sandeep, Ramu, Luvkush and Ravi of my village dedicated rape upon me, Sandeep then strangulated me with dupatta’,” the affidavit states.

A replica of the unique assertion (in Hindi) that has a thumbprint attributed to the sufferer, together with a translation has been annexed with the affidavit.

It says: “Victim was enquired in type of questionnaire that in your earlier assertion you’ve got acknowledged that Sandeep has solely molested you, however now you’re saying rape being dedicated upon you by all 4 accused individuals, on which the sufferer acknowledged that at the moment I used to be not fully in a state of consciousness. All of them have additionally dedicated rape on me. And I don’t need to say the rest.”

The affidavit additionally states that the grievance submitted by the sufferer’s brother to the police on September 14 stated Sandeep tried to “strangulate my sister with the intention to kill her”.

“The woman additionally acknowledged that Sandeep had made an try to strangulate her throat by hand and there was ache in her neck. Both the sufferer and the mom clearly acknowledged (video recorded) that she was not injured anyplace apart from the neck, that accused was solely Sandeep and that nothing else had occurred,” the affidavit states within the part ‘transient chronology of occasions’.

It says docs at Aligarh “repeatedly suggested the dad and mom to present their consent to shift the woman to a spinal harm specialist hospital in order that the sufferer might be handled higher. However, the dad and mom refused to present their consent”.

Annexed is an announcement purportedly signed by the daddy and brother, saying, “I’m … (the lady’s) brother and we’re happy with the remedy. We will hold our affected person right here itself. If one thing occurs to the affected person, docs and the hospital won’t be accountable. Verified by Dr Sahil 24/9.20 @ 7.10 pm.”

It was on September 28, in line with the annexed paperwork, {that a} determination was taken to shift the lady to Delhi. A report by the JN Medical College and Hospital reads: “Referral to greater centre (AIIMS) on request.”

“Poor prognosis has been defined to affected person’s attendants throughout course of remedy and transportation. Patient attendants need referral to greater centre (AIIMS) for additional administration,” the doc reads.

The lady was finally admitted at Safdarjung Hospital, the place she died.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the newest headlines

For all the newest India News, obtain Indian Express App.

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here