IOA vp Sudhanshu Mittal alleged that ‘a significant cowl up’ was performed to permit Narinder Batra to contest election for Indian Olympic Association.
- Last Updated: June 8, 2020, 11:10 PM IST
Two-and-a-half years after Narinder Batra’s election as Indian Olympic Association chief, certainly one of its vice presidents has questioned his taking on the highest job, saying he was not even eligible to contest the polls underneath the then structure.
IOA vp Sudhanshu Mittal, in a letter to the International hockey federation FIH, alleged that “a significant cowl up” was performed to permit Narendra Batra contest election for the highest sports activities job of the nation.
Mittal stated Batra’s eligibility was “falsified” twice and one even impacted his place as FIH president in 2017.
Mittal’s allegations on the “illegality” of Batra’s election have come amid the feud among the many high brass of the IOA. He had earlier written to the International Olympic Committee, claiming that Batra was “illegally” elected as IOA president.
Batra on Monday had stated that he’ll reply to Mittal’s allegations as soon as he joins workplace after his residence quarantine.
Mittal’s major allegation is that the IOA structure of 2013, as authorised by the IOC, offered that the presidential candidate should be a member of the previous government council and Batra was not a member of that.
He alleged that structure’s interpretation was modified to membership of two previous government councils as an alternative of solely the final council in a Special General Body Meeting held on November 29, 2017.
It occurred two days after the nomination of candidates was launched to permit Batra contest the elections. Batra was elected IOA chief on December 14, 2017.
“It could be very clear…that this resolution to alter the interpretation of the structure of the IOA (within the SGM of Nov 29, 2017) to incorporate any two previous (2012 and 2014) Executive Council as an alternative of previous (2014) Executive Council was taken by the General Assembly after three folks filed nomination for the submit of president,” Mittal stated within the letter.
“To be extra particular, Batra was not eligible to contest for the submit of president on the date of his submitting of nomination, on or previous to 27/11/2017.”
He additionally stated that the minutes of the SGM which talked about a change in interpretation of the structure was solely authorised on December 14, 2017.
“If the election needed to be duly held in accordance with the modified interpretation of the structure, the election discover ought to have been issued after 14/12/2017,” he wrote.
His one other allegation is that Batra was nominated by Hockey India to the electoral faculty of the IOA for the 2017 polls even supposing he was now not related to it since he had already resigned as its president following his election as FIH chief.
Under IOA structure, the individual nominated by every member items have to be the members of the chief our bodies of those items.
“…Batra was both president of FIH in his private capability and didn’t characterize Hockey India or he represented Hockey India as an Executive Board member to the electoral faculty of the IOA,” Mittal wrote within the letter.
“The president of worldwide hockey federation who’s accountable for integrity compromised it for self curiosity.”
Under FIH structure, all members of the Executive Board (aside from presidents of continental federations) maintain workplace of their private capability and never as representatives of any member or another organisation.