SC reserves verdict on journalist Vinod Dua’s plea for quashing of FIR

By: PTI | New Delhi |

October 6, 2020 9:41:31 pm

Editors Guild, Vinod Dua, Charges against journalists, right to speech, Indian express newsAn FIR in opposition to Dua beneath provisions of Indian Penal Code for offences of sedition, public nuisance, printing defamatory supplies and public mischief was lodged by BJP chief Shyam

The Supreme Court Tuesday reserved verdict on a plea of senior journalist Vinod Dua looking for quashing of FIR lodged in opposition to him for sedition and different offences by a neighborhood BJP chief in Himachal Pradesh over his YouTube present.

A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Vineet Saran, after listening to arguments for Dua, Himachal Pradesh authorities and the complainant within the case, requested the events to file written submissions within the matter inside three days.

On July 20, the highest court docket had prolonged until additional orders the safety granted to Dua from any coercive motion within the case. The prime court docket had stated that Dua needn’t reply another supplementary questions requested by Himachal Pradesh police in reference to the case.

On July 7, the highest court docket had prolonged the safety to Dua from any coercive motion and sought a report in a sealed cowl on the probe performed to this point by the state police.

An FIR in opposition to Dua beneath provisions of Indian Penal Code for offences of sedition, public nuisance, printing defamatory supplies and public mischief was lodged by BJP chief Shyam at Kumarsain police station in Shimla district on May 6 and the journalist was requested to affix the probe.

Shyam has alleged that Dua, in his YouTube present, accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of utilizing “deaths and terror assaults” to get votes.

Earlier, in an unprecedented listening to performed on a Sunday on June 14, the highest court docket had granted safety from arrest to Dua until additional orders. However, it had refused to remain the continued probe in opposition to him.

It had requested Dua should be a part of the investigation ?by way of video-conferencing or on-line mode? as supplied by him in his response to the summons issued by the police looking for his private look.

Besides looking for quashing of the FIR, Dua, within the plea, has sought “exemplary damages” for “harassment”.

He has additionally sought route from the apex court docket that “henceforth FIRs in opposition to individuals belonging to the media with at the very least 10 years standing be not registered until cleared by a committee to be constituted by each state authorities, the composition of which ought to comprise of the Chief Justice of the High Court or a Judge designated by him, the chief of the Opposition and the Home Minister of the State.”

Dua has stated freedom of the press is a elementary proper assured beneath Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The plea stated the highest court docket has been “emphasizing for distancing the police from the ruling celebration within the state” however “not one of the main political events that are in energy in numerous states are prepared to surrender their management over the police”.

“There is a latest development in opposition to the media the place state governments which don’t discover a explicit telecast to be in sync with their political ideologies register FIRs in opposition to individuals of the media primarily to harass them and to intimidate them in order that they succumb to the road of the state or else face the music by the hands of the police,” the plea claimed.

Lodging of FIR and coercive steps in opposition to Dua amounted to “direct and brazen violation” of his elementary rights, the plea stated.

The plea claimed there’s a concerted method of authorities “to silence the media which isn’t palatable to them”.

It alleged that the FIR registered in opposition to Dua is “politically motivated” and is “purely to settle scores for critically evaluating the functioning of the central authorities at the moment of COVID”.

“The restriction imposed in opposition to free speech refers to points that are a menace to public order, decency, morality, and the safety of the state. In the case of the petitioner (Dua) details that are publicly verifiable and are true have been handled as a floor for sedition and different critical offences that are removed from the reality,” it stated.

The plea stated Dua is a senior citizen with co-morbidities, together with hypertension and diabetes.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the most recent headlines

For all the most recent India News, obtain Indian Express App.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here