| Mumbai |
November 1, 2020 4:03:00 am
States that withdrew ‘basic consent’ to the CBI to analyze circumstances similar to West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan noticed a direct drop in variety of circumstances registered by the central company, however a March 2020 Calcutta High Court order in favour of the CBI despatched up the numbers in West Bengal this yr.
The Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) authorities in Maharashtra on October 21 turned the most recent Opposition-ruled state to withdraw ‘basic consent’ to the CBI fearing that it could take up circumstances being probed by the state police. Earlier this yr, the CBI took over the Sushant Singh Rajput suicide case investigation on the request of the Bihar Police — a transfer later permitted by the Supreme Court. The Mumbai Police had been earlier probing the suicide.
After the CBI took over a ‘Television Rating Points (TRP) rip-off’ from the UP Police, the Maharashtra authorities, apparently fearing a takeover of Mumbai Police’s investigation in an analogous rip-off, nicely and determined to withdraw consent.
While CBI officers claimed off the report this may harm their anti-corruption drive towards authorities officers in Maharashtra, numbers from the opposite states give a clearer image.
Data obtainable with the company reveals that in West Bengal, 34 and 41 circumstances respectively have been registered in 2017 and 2018 when the CBI had basic consent from the state. Consent was withdrawn in November 2018, and in 2019, solely 12 circumstances have been registered. However, in 2020, the CBI West Bengal unit registered 56 circumstances in simply 10 months until October. This is larger than the variety of circumstances that the company has registered prior to now 5 years.
A senior CBI official from West Bengal stated that in 2019 they hardly obtained any response from the state authorities to any of the circumstances they despatched for consent from them. “In the absence of state authorities consent, in circumstances of let’s say a central authorities worker looking for bribe, we’d inform the vigilance division of that exact unit,” the official stated. “Hence the variety of circumstances in 2019 decreased,” the official added.
In 2020, following the low variety of circumstances with the West Bengal CBI unit, it was determined at hand over 16 FIRs associated to the ponzi scheme fraud that the Supreme Court had requested the CBI to analyze in 2014, to the West Bengal CBI unit.
Soon, the CBI acquired one other shot within the arm when the Calcutta High Court in March this yr handed an order stating, “This courtroom is, due to this fact, of the view that, the central authorities/CBI’s energy to analyze and prosecute its personal officers can’t be in any means impeded or interfered by the state even when the offences have been dedicated throughout the territory of the state.”
An official stated, “After the HC judgment in March, we’ve began registering circumstances as earlier than with out the state authorities’s consent. Hence the entire variety of circumstances within the present yr is larger than earlier than. Now except the HC resolution is challenged by the state authorities, we’ll use the judgment to register circumstances.”
Along with West Bengal underneath TMC, the then Andhra Pradesh authorities underneath TDP too had withdrawn ‘basic consent’ to the CBI in November 2018. However, in June 2019, the brand new Jaganmohan Reddy authorities restored basic consent. In the eight-month interval that the consent was withdrawn, solely 4 circumstances have been registered by the CBI Visakhapatnam unit. In 2020, 14 circumstances have been registered within the ten months of the present yr.
Later, Chhattisgarh withdrew basic consent in January 2019. After withdrawal of consent, it registered simply three circumstances in that yr in comparison with 13 within the earlier yr.
Rajasthan withdrew basic consent in July this yr after which no circumstances have been registered by the CBI there. Prior to the withdrawal in July, a minimum of 4 circumstances have been registered between January and July this yr.
Within the CBI, there’s a view that one choice to operate in states which have withdrawn consent is to invoke the Calcutta High Court judgment in these states as nicely, however the central company has not but chosen this path. A CBI spokesperson stated they’d not need to touch upon the difficulty.
📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the most recent headlines